Thursday, February 24, 2011

Martin Luther King/ I have a dream

 
Martin Luther King is stating his belief and  demanding that all the African American's receive full citizen rights and are treaeted like an equal to whites. " if the nation returns to business as usual. And there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges".-(Martin Luther King)

He's style of speech is Pathos because he is sharing his beliefs on the Unfair treatment of African Americans. He is also using a bit of Logos because he is explaining how words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence had made promises to all americans that  guaranteed the "unalienable Rights" of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness to all men white and black.


 He's using repetition to engage the Audience this is the paragraph in which-But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. 

He is explaining the history of negros and then moving to america the negro is still under enslavement. Also very recent history for the time it was spoken about the signing of the constitutional rights. And how they did not

Yes this speech definitely would be effective on the audience.

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Julius Ceasar

Mark Antony:

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him;
The evil that men do lives after them,
The good is oft interred with their bones,
So let it be with Caesar ... The noble Brutus
Hath told you Caesar was ambitious: If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Caesar answered it ...
Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest, (For Brutus is an honourable man;
So are they all; all honourable men)
Come I to speak in Caesar's funeral ...
He was my friend, faithful and just to me:
But Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honourable man….
He hath brought many captives home to Rome,
Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill:
Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?
When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:
Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honourable man.
You all did see that on the Lupercal
I thrice presented him a kingly crown,
Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?
Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And, sure, he is an honourable man.
I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke,
But here I am to speak what I do know.
You all did love him once, not without cause:
What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?
O judgement! thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason…. Bear with me;
My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,
And I must pause till it come back to me.
 
Green is continuous repetition and continuely reminding the Audience what is speech is explaining.-
 
The Red are significant points in his Speech that really captivate the audience.
 
 
 
 
 

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Womens Right to Vote Susan B

  1. Read the following speech and determine what form of logical reasoning (from Aristotle) she is using in her argument. Give quotes to support your decision.
  2. What is the 'thesis' (main point) of her speech. Give the sentence you feel serves as the thesis.
  3. Divide the speech into three parts: Intro, Body, Conclusion
    Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight as an indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.
    The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
    "We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
    It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people - women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government - the ballot.
    For any state to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of one entire half of the people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post facto law, and is therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of liberty are forever withheld from women and their female posterity.
    To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household - which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.
    Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
    The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several states is today null and void, precisely as is every one against Negroes.
    Susan B. Anthony - 1873
    Highlight the text where you see the techniques below being used in the speech. When highlighting the text in the speech where one of these techniques is used.
    • Repetition
    • Exaggeration/Hyperbole
    • Generalizations
    • Clichés
    • Statistics/Distortion of facts
    • Imperatives
    • Emotive words
    • Use of imagery/symbolism
    • Puns
    • Use of endorsements/testimonials
    • Rhetorical questions
    • Inclusive language
    • Euphemism 
    HOMEWORK: Due Monday 21/2
    Determine the thesis or goal of the speaker (what is he trying to persuade of the audience?)
    What mode of persuasion is used?
    Highlight the techniques he uses using the list (with colours) below.
     
    The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities.
     
    This is the thesis of the speech and the overall debate over womens rights and demands to be respected as human beings.  I believe the technique is definitely logos. Due to Constantly reinforcing her speech with factual imformation on the United States Constitution. 
     
    Here is an Example of that.
    The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
    "We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
     
     
     

Sunday, February 6, 2011

The Nugget

3 men by the names of Bookie, Michael and pete are local road workers in the town of manangatang in central new south wales. It is a Bright Sunday morning, with a light breeze blowing to the south. Pete recently bought a metal detector in hope of finding valuables that they so desperately needed. They usually stopped by the trencherman bar for few beer's before going onto the road that needed repairing but today was sunday, a free day to do what ever they liked.

Today was their chance to go out and test the metal detector. Oi, Bookie!, pete said. Hurry up, I wana be back for lunch, he said. Pete was sitting in his old 1976 Holden Commodore that was his fathers. Michael was sitting in the back seat constantly changing positions in his seat. Man it's hot Pete, he said. Are you sure this metal detector even works? Pete replied, Yeah, real quality deal the man up in Ouyen gave it to me for only $500. 500 DIDGEREEEEDOOS!, Michael shouted. We havent got that kind of money to throw around////// to be continued..........